This report by G2M Insights examines the true level of broadband competition across 189 U.S. metropolitan areas by counting only the credible providers available at specific residential addresses. The research reveals that while many markets appear crowded, most households actually face a wireline duopoly where any third option is typically licensed fixed wireless rather than a high-speed physical connection. By ranking cities like Corpus Christi and Huntsville at the top, the study demonstrates that mid-sized metros often enjoy more diverse choices than massive hubs like New York or Los Angeles. Furthermore, the data shows that competition vanishes significantly when the speed requirement is raised to gigabit levels, leaving very few locations with three or more wireline alternatives. Ultimately, the analysis warns providers that market size does not guarantee competitive variety and that the presence of fixed wireless is the primary factor disrupting traditional two-party markets.